Archive for the ‘Reflections’ Category

Every character we meet in a story has a backstory, even if it’s not always elaborated on at first. Voldemort has a history, though we don’t get the full grasp of it until around the sixth book or so of Harry Potter. Han Solo had an entire career and a few debts to Jabba the Hutt before he and Chewbacca met Luke and Obi-Wan, though we only find out about it in the Expanded Universe. And before Alex Cross battled his first psychopath, he had lived in Virginia, grown up in DC, and gone to college to study psychology and psychiatry. Heck, James Bond probably has a full history, though I’m not sure if Ian Fleming ever went into great detail about it.

This evening I wrapped up a major part of the Snake’s history, and how he went from a regular–okay, not-so-much regular, but still relatively regular compared to what he became–teen into a serial killer who hunts members of a certain powerful mafia family. It was probably the longest chapter yet in Snake (which is saying something, seeing as thrillers have very short chapters), and I had a lot of fun writing it and exploring the Snake’s disturbed psyche. I’ll probably go over it again before I move onto the next chapter, but it’s still a chapter that’s very important to the story and a chapter that, if all my dreams ever come true, will be reviewed by future generations as a memorable scene in the development of the Snake.

Now that I think about it, the Snake’s modus operandi was the first thing that I created for the Snake and his backstory, including why he’s kiling (which is the major driving force of the plot, if truth be told), came afterwards. At first he was nothing more than the archetypal bloodthirsty killer, but when I gave him backstory he seemed almost like a character that, while most people would condemn his actions if he were a real person, would identify with him on an emotional level. Maybe that’s why I enjoyed writing his character so much, and why I think as people read more and more about the Snake and the mystery of his is peeled away, they may come to enjoy the character more.

That’s the hope anyway.

For my fellow writers out there, how do you develop character backstory? Do you create the character first and then create a history to match? Do you think the backstory influences the character, or the character decides the backstory? And what sort of backstories do you like to create? Let me know if you don’t mind sharing.

Rape.

This one word can send terror through a person’s system. In some ways it is worse than murder, for after the deed is done, the victim still suffers horribly from the experience, sometimes for life. 1 in 5 women on college campuses will be the victim of a sexual assault, and every year 32,o00 rape victims are impregnated by friends, boyfriends, husbands, acquaintances, stalkers, fathers, brothers, total strangers, coworkers, you name it. Rape is the perversion of sexual intercourse, turning something beautiful and great into a nightmare, a travesty of psychological anguish. Our culture is fascinated by it as we are repulsed by it, as can be seen by the enduring popularity of Law & Order: Special Vitctims Unit, and by the constant stories in the media of rapists and their victims.

Earlier this week, Representative Todd Akin, a Republican running for a Senate seat in Missouri, said that “legitimate rape” victims “rarely get pregnant”. Immediately, this caused a firestorm: Mitt Romney immediately distanced himself from Akin, saying that victims of rape should be able to get abortions; President Obama was quoted as saying “rape is rape” and that “men should not be making decisions about women’s health”; and across the nation, thousands of rape victims railed against Akin, questioning him and his definiton of rape.

Personally, I find Mr. Akin’s comments to be very upsetting. Although the number of adult male rape victims are still relatively low (yes, they do exist, and there may be more victims than reported due to fears that men will lose their “masculinity” if it becomes known they were raped), men should know that rape is a horrible thing, it cannot be classified as “legitimate” or “illegitimate”, and any type or rape can get a girl pregnant. As a politician, Mr. Akin should be doubly aware of this fact.

I’ve taken a Women and Gender Studies course, I’ve watched shows and read novels where women have been brutally raped, and in my novel Reborn City, my main character Zahara comes very close to being raped herself. Every time I think of rape, every time I read or watch a scene involving a rape, and the one time I wrote about Zahara’s near rape, I could almost feel the terror, the shock of being violated, the urge to end the pain and the constant fear that it could happen again. It is a powerful, mind-numbing force, and it cannot be taken lightly under any circumstances.

I hope Mr. Akin and others learn that rape is not something to be talked about like it can be classified or screened for authenticity, but an act that destroys lives as surely as murder destroys lives, and for women who become pregnant from rape, carrying that child to term can be an ordeal only imaginable, like a cancer that eventually morphs into a constant reminder of one person’s cruelty to another. To Mr. Akin, I feel sorry that you do not understand the tragedy of rape and hope you learn about it, because rape and the pregnancices that can result are very serious matters. And to women everywhere: if, God forbid, you should be raped, I hope Mr. Akin’s comments do not stop you from getting the help you need, and especially if you become pregnant because of your rape.

And if you are worried you are alone in the world because of what you went through, know this: you have at least one friend here with you. I may be hidden by the anonymous Internet, but I’m here for you across the blogosphere.

Last night, Jon Stewart invited an author onto his show who had originally self-published her memoir on growing up a religious Mormon before it was picked up by a major publishing compnay and became a best-seller. This morning, I read a post from a fellow blogger who not only self-published, but for this post had interviewed another self-published author who is doing quite well with her writing. And earlier this week, while waiting for the doctor to show up at my appointment, I talked to the nurse about self-publishing and how it’s changing the writing industry in so many ways.

And of course, at some point in the past two weeks, I saw an ad for that self-publishing miracle, Fifty Shades of Grey.

My point is, self-publishing is more relevant today than ever, and the only reason I’m touching upon this subject again, when I wrote a post about it a few months ago, is because it keeps popping up in my life and invading my thoughts. More and more I think about publishing my novel through a self-publishing service, when a few years ago I would’ve seen it as a vanity press and a scam and turned my nose up at it! A few years ago only a few authors did self-publishing, while today many do and get famous from it (E.L. James and Christopher Paolini are great examples). And with the blogosphere full of writers, it’s all too easy about how novels are getting published through this method and how happy the authors are about it.

If you’re a self-published author, tell me! What’s your take on it? What have your experriences been? Because I seriously want Reborn City to become a novel and I’m seriously considering taking a look at Lulu or Createspace to do it!

I turned on my computer, logged onto the Internet, and what did I see? “BREAKING NEWS: Shooting at Sikh Temple!” The first thing that goes through my mind is “Oh my God!” The second thing that goes through my mind is, “It’s like Aurora all over again.”

And you know what? It is like Aurora! Sure, the shooter is dead, so we may never know what motivated this attack, and it’s too early to know what sort of weapon the shoorter was using. But how many more shootings are going to occur before the elections before we get some stricter gun laws?!! I’ll be shocked if Congress doesn’t act on this! And if it doesn’t, then maybe they will after another shooting occurs! Because you know what Congress not taking action tells people who may be tempted to do their own shootings? It says nothing will prevent them from getting guns the legal way, so fire away!

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m all for the Second Amendment. If someone wants to go hunting or protect themselves in their homes, that’s their choice and it’s protected by the constitution. But when anyone can walk into a gun shop and buy an assault weapon used by military forces, then you know something’s not right!

So Congress, do us all a favor, make some stricter gun laws before we suffer any more deaths!

Why Dolls Freak Me Out

Posted: July 31, 2012 in Reflections, Scary Stuff
Tags:

Does anyone else feel this photo might give them nightmares? It’s perfect for this post.

Last post, I mentioned that I was working on a short story involving a doll, and as I’m into the whole scaring people silly thing, I thought I’d talk about why dolls might freak people out, specifically dummies and those old bisque and porcelain dolls. Frankly, those are the kinds I have trouble with; anything from traditional dolls of certain cultures to the Barbies and Bratz of today I’m fine with (I had enough of the latter in my house thanks to my younger sisters). It’s just dummies and bisque dolls creep me out, and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone in that.

I think it might have something to do with the eyes: most dolls that have eyes, their eyes are painted on or they’re made from plastic. Because those eyes are flat, 2D, and not very life-like at all, you become less afraid of those types of dolls. But the eyes of dummies and bisque dolls are made from glass or plastic made to resemble glass. This gives them such a life-like appearance, you can’t help but think the dolls are alive, watching you, taking in every single little thing you do. It’s unnerving to think that not only a toy is watching you, but taking in information that it can use against you. I bet that if those big-eyed dolls could change their expressions, they’d have  sly little grins on their faces, the type of grins that say, I know so muc about you and I’m going to hold it forever in me until I can use it to make you do what I want you to do. Creepy! The only time I’ve ever found it anything other than creepy was in the manga/anime Rozen Maiden, but then again manga and anime have that effect, don’t they?

Anyone else have any thoughts on this? If so, let me know.

Oh, guess what? Today I made the milestone of 3000 views on my blog! Awesome!

I’ve a little over two hours before I go to see The Dark Knight Rises and I’m super-excited! I have no idea what’s going to happen in the movie, except Batman, Catwoman, and Bane go head to head, and it’s going to be awesome! Thank God I didn’t go online and read any spoilers!

Sadly, I will be thinking of the Aurora shooting when I go. A generation from now, viewers of The Dark Knight trilogy, as the Nolan films are collectively called, might not even be aware that such a horrible event occurred, but for those of us in the here and now, it weighs heavily on our minds. I’ll probably say a quick little prayer for the victims and survivors before I go into the theater (I’m just spiritual that way).

So before I go, I just want to tell you two things:

1. I’ll have a review of the film as soon as I get home and have dinner, and

2. I’m close to 77 Microsoft Word pages of Snake. Know what that will probably mean? A Lucky 7 excerpt!

See you after the film.

This past week the world was witness to two horrible tragedies: the first was in Bulgaria, where a busload of Israeli tourists were killed by what appears to be a suicide bomber while on a bus. Then a few days later, a man in Aurora, Colorado went into a viewing of The Dark Knight Rises and proceeded to shoot up the audience. These tragedies touched me profoundly for a number of reasons, and this morning when I went to synagogue to pray this morning, I made sure to say a Mourner’s Kaddish for the victims of these horrible tragedies.

Already though, we are hearing, on TV and the Internet, on the radio and in the newspapers, on the street and in our homes, what these tragedies may signify and what should be done. I would like to say a few things about these discussions:

 The first is to the suicide bomber in Bulgaria, who is believed to be linked to terrorist organization Hezbollah. Hezbollah claims they are following the will of Allah by attempting to wipe Israel and its citizens off the map. If you ask me, the members of Hezbollah are not Muslims in any sense of the religion; I’ve met, discussed, and formed friendships with quite a few Muslims, both secular and religious, and they have been nothing but kind, courteous, and when Israel is brought up, willing to talk compromise in the hopes of a true peace. These people who claim they are killing in Allah’s name are flouting the commandment to preserve life, a basic tenet not just in Islam but in many religions worldwide.

The point is, if you’re killing in the name of your god, no matter what religion you are from, you are not acting as a member of that religion. You are acting as a murderer. And so before we go blaming any religion for the actions of an individual claiming to be acting in that religion’s name, let us remember this person does not represent an entire faith; they only represent themselves (and their radical organization, if they belong to one).

On the flip side, we cannot blame a lack of religion for a crime just as we cannot blame a religion for a crime: today a congressman from Oklahoma went on TV and said that “the attack on Judeo-Christian principles” was the reason the Aurora tragedy happened, even though Jason Holmes, the suspected gunman, has not given  a motive as far as law enforcement is aware. If you ask me, a lack of religion or the absence of religion at school or a workplace or a lack of emphasis of religious values in national policy does not necessarily mean someone will become a murderer. No, what it means that people can make choices based on religious values or on their own values or the values of others. What those choices are though, are that person’s and that person’s alone, and we cannot say that whether or not they had religious values in their lives was the reason behind their murders just as we can’t say that a religion is the reason certain people commit murder. It just doesn’t make any sense at all, at least not to me.

And one more thing: I heard someone blaming the attack in Aurora on violent movies and considering stricter regulations on these movies. Not too long after, the commissioner of the NYPD came out saying that the Aurora shooter may have been acting under the impression that he was the Joker. This will most likely reignite the debate about whether media content should be regulated or banned based on factors like violence or sex. As a writer of stories that more often than not have violent elements, I have to say that’d be counterproductive: if someone commits a crime and it bears a similarity to a movie or a video game and that person may be connected to the movie or video game, I tend to think that person was already mentally unbalanced and that they just incorporated that movie or game into their mental instability somehow. And you can’t point the finger at one single movie, game, book, show, or song and say they caused a crime: a person’s mental make-up is the product of a number of biological, environmental, cultural, and sociological factors over a period of time, so pinpointing the one thing that causes mental instability can be tricky, if not impossible. And besides, plenty of people who are certified crazy blame their actions on the Bible, God, the Devil, or a million different religious-related things. We don’t consider banning the religion, do we? No! That’d be ridiculous.

I don’t deny that media can affect our perceptions of reality and society, I just don’t think that blaming it for a person’s actions is the wisest decision, let alone banning or further regulating it.

So what do I say caused these tragedies? Individuals who couldn’t understand the beauty of life and whose reasoning is probably as horrible as the tragedies they committed. That is my opinion, and I also belive there are ways you can stop these sorts of things from every happening again:

The first is to make sure that children understand how important life is. Children tend to see abstract concepts as concrete, and I think teaching children how wonderful life is and how we should cherish it can cause those who may see killing bugs is fun or violence is cool to reconsider their positions, and keep these lessons throughout their lives.

At the same time, I don’t think you should expose children to violent games or movies, at least not until a certain age, and certainly not until they’ve learned that what they see on the screen is not real and that what goes on in the game or film doesn’t always reflect reality. In fact, it usually doesn’t.

And finally, I think where adults and grown teenagers are concerned, access to guns and other deadly weapons should be more strictly regulated, as when people have easy access to guns, things such as Columbine, Virginia Tech, or Aroura are made that much easier to pull off. Not only that, but it may be a good idea to institute psych exams for children and teens who are repeat breakers of the law, as many psychopaths commit crimes at young ages and that’s the perfect time to get them off the streets.

You may feel free to disagree with me, I’m fine with that. I just thought I’d voice my opinion on the subject since others certainly will. And I’d like to say one more thing: to the victims of these tragedies that could have been avoided, you were taken too soon, and we will never forget you. To the families and friends of the victims, my heart and my condolences go out to you, and I wish you all healing and compassion in this time of grief. To the people who celebrate the murderers for their deeds, I find you detestable and pity you. And to those tasked with fighting and stopping these monsters from committing these crimes, I pray for wisdom and good luck to be given you in your mission to preserve the peace in our world.

That is all.

Alright, so last night I thought I’d celebrate “Aasif” getting published by watching a scary movie (if you have no idea what I just said, please head to the last post). What movie did I watch? Candyman, a horror film involving a guy with a hook who appears when you call his name Bloody Mary-style. Did I enjoy it? Not really; there were so many things just wrong with it. This has led me to this post, where I will go over things from the point-of-views of both a fan of horror and a writer of horror and say what I think you should do when you’re making a horror film.

So, for those readers not really interested in horror, so very sorry that this post isn’t aimed at your interests. For those of you who are fans of horror, please take notes and let me know if I missed anything, so that i can do a follow-up post if necessary. Alright, on we go. Here’s some things you should avoid if you’re making a horror film:

1. Don’t go crazy on the sequels: Yes, I know I’ve already had time to complain about the nauseating amount of sequels out there these days, but horror movies are the worst offenders, and as the number of the films gets higher, the quality of the films get lower, which is why most of these films end up becoming direct-to-DVD after a while. Seriously, after a few films, you gotta know when to stop. After all, movies aren’t like novels; you can only pack so much into an hour-and-a-half to two-and-a-half hour show, especially if you’re doing a slasher, where it’s heavily reliant on blood and guts to scare your audience and less about character development.

2. Make it believable: I once read an interview in which a fantasy writer was asked what makes a good setting. His answer (and I’m paraphrasing a bit): “You have to make it believable. You can’t write a story and say, ‘I’m going to have a world where everyone has guns but nobody uses them’. It just doesn’t make sense.” The same can be said of just about anything in storytelling: make it believable. That’s what’ll keep people interested in your work. Otherwise you’ll have a lousy time at the box office. A good example of this is Priest, which came out last year if I remember right. The problem was, if your species is being eradicated by a bunch of monsters, you wouldn’t put the monsters on reservations, would you? I don’t think so, and that’s why the movie failed.

Another example is the movie Leprechaun, whose titular character was too comical to be scary (and I still have no idea why there was five sequels). That was a major reason why that movie was panned by critics. And Candyman also had some trouble in the scary villain department. Our killer ghost looks like a well-dressed African-American man in nice clothes, so even with the hook on his arm he doesn’t seem all that intimidating. It’s only until you see what’s underneath his clothes that you start to get why he’s a monster, but you’re still not scared. Honestly, would it have killed the filmmakers to give him some scary contact lenses to accentuate his ghostliness? Even better, make his face swollen and covered in honey, because after all he died by bee sting.

3. Motive: This goes back to the “make it believable” thing, and was something I thought a lot about while watching Candyman last night. Our villain seems preoccupied with making sure people fear him. Why? That’s not explained very well. I I were the ghost of a man who was murdered by racists who cut off my arm and caused a hive of bees to attack me, I’d be more into getting revenge…on anyone I can get my hands on. Yet Candyman still wants people to recognize him. Okay, but what’s the purpose of that?

Point of the story is, make sure you have a motive that people can understand, and if you don’t, explain it, or do what Prometheus did and make it so that even if you don’t know the motive, it doesn’t matter, there’s other stuff going on right now.

4. Know what your audience has come to see: This was my biggest problem with the remake of Friday the 13th. We all went to that film to see Jason tear up the screen anew. What we got was more like a bunch of hypersexualized co-eds parading around naked while a serial killer watched and picked them off every few minutes. Yes, the Friday the 13th films are famous for their sexiness, but that’s supposed to be an added bonus, not the main attraction. What we come for is to get scared. If the filmmakers had focused more on building tension and making the deaths more dramatic and less time on filming bare-breasted girls, I think we’d hear me rant less on this film.

5. Recycling is bad: Boy, that sounds bad out of context. However it’s important to keep coming up with new stuff. You can’t expect people to be satisfied with the old chase-and-kill scenario twelve times in each film. You’ve got to make each film unique so that the moviegoers can gush about an individual scene afterwards. Take Scream 2 for example: there was that moment where Sidney and her best friend were trapped in a police car with an unconscious Ghostface and the only way out was to crawl over him. That scene scared the heck out of me! That’s why the second film in that series was better than the first. However, the filmmakers didn’t seem to do that four films 3 and 4, and that’s why I don’t like those films.

So don’t recycle. And if you have to, try to make it look like it’s not.

6. It’s not about the kill, it’s how you film it: Too many times have I seen a character attacked and murdered and not been freaked. Why? Because the lead-up to it and the way it was filmed wasn’t terrifying in the least! There are brilliant scenes in movies like Final Destination and The Woman in Black that you didn’t know was going to happen until it happened, and that’s what made them scary. This can also be applied to just building up for a small scare, such as in the Paranormal Activity films. If you study those films and see what they did, you can scare so much more easily.

Otherwise, you may make a film like some others I know where everybody’s like, “Oh, she’s gonna get it, it’s coming soon…she’s dead. Oh well.”

That’s all I have for now. Got any other ideas? Let me know, I’ll write another post on this subject.

I decided that I wanted to do a little studying of psychopaths, since I’m writing a novel involving serial killer. I heard about a book by journalist Jon Ronson called “The Psychopath Test” and decided to take a look at it. I learned a lot (but I won’t be doing a review of it for my own reasons):

For instance, while “psychopath” and “sociopath” are practically interchangeable terms, “psychopaths” and “serial killers” aren’t, which I think some people believe. Serial killers may suffer from any of a hole host of mental disorders besides psychopathy (bipolar, delusions, schizophrenia, psychosis, etc), or they may just be motivated by the usual suspects for committing crimes: greed, anger, or for a thrill. Psychopaths are individuals who are unable to feel emotions, probably due to a problem in their amygdala.

I also learned a few things about diagnosing psychopaths, including checklists used to identify psychopaths (which, if you should get your hands on one, you should not use thinking it’s a wonder tool for diagnosing killers; only trained professionals can really make use of those checklists, and usually in tandem with several other tools, including history of violence, interviews with patients, and several other factors. It still didn’t stop me from trying to diagnose real and fictional people, though). And the theory of psychopaths as some of the top people on Wall Street and in major corporations was explored, with some very interesting conclusions.

So, how does this relate to Snake? Well, I can say this much; my serial killer is not a psychopath (though another character certainly is!). However, he probably is suffering from another mental disorder, and I have no idea what it could be, so I’ll have to check it out once I find somebody who can give me an idea of what a profiler might think of my character based on just his murders. If you know anyone like that who could help, please don’t hesitate to tell me.

Serious Humor

Posted: July 8, 2012 in Reflections, Writing
Tags:

With a title like that, you know you wanna read this post.

Alright, after sufficient time to geek out over Anne Rice coming onto my blog and giving me a major boost in stats (see last post), I got down to reading a volume about a Japanese comic book that I liked. The series, Bakuman, is about two teens who team up to write Japanese comic books together. It’s very unique and lots of fun to read (especially since it’s a look into a very different industry than writing), but occasionally they teach me something about my own work. Like last night, for example:

In the comic book, the main characters were discussing with their editor about how to deliver humor in a serious comic book that isn’t delivered in an annoying or off-putting way. They called it “serious humor”, and during the course of the comic book the creators of Bakuman took many oppurtunities just to illustrate their point. There was one instance when they were discussing a change in the editorial department and how it was a very big change for many characters. Serious, right? But the way they illustrated the characters’ reactions was hilarious, and it didn’t detract from the work at all.

Pretty soon I started noticing this “serious humor” in some other works I read. James Patterson, in his Alex Cross novels, has had points where the characters said something that was dead serious, but it was delivered in such a funny way. Heck, even something Alex does or observes, while serious to him, is delivered in funny ways, and yet the reader is not put-off by it at all! Instead, the work is enhanced in a way.

And then I remembered, in the fifth chapter of my work-in-progress Snake, one of the characters says something and while he’s being serious, I’m cracking up while writing it. It’s funny that I wrote that the same day I read a comic book that explores the subject.

Conclusion: serious humor is not something easily tapped into, and it’s not something you calculate either. I guess you can say that you put it in when the time is right, that it just comes to you and you go with it. At least, that’s how I find it.

All for now. Oh, and I highly recommend Bakuman, it’s very interesting. Available in hard-copy and e-book format.